more patches...

bsd.port.mk.diff

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+Index: ./share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5
+===================================================================
+RCS file: /home/cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
+retrieving revision 1.550
+diff -u -p -u -p -r1.550 bsd.port.mk.5
+--- ./share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5	22 Nov 2021 11:17:39 -0000	1.550
++++ ./share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5	12 Dec 2021 12:02:38 -0000
+@@ -3562,6 +3562,7 @@ This is often because of confusion betwe
+ RUN_DEPENDS is needed for dlopen'd libraries.
+ .Pp
+ Might be intentional sometimes, if some compile flavors create static binaries,
++or the port rebuild needs to be linked to the update of a runtime dependency
+ for instance.
+ Also, will happen for multi-packages, where one sets LIB_DEPENDS to have
+ a given build dependency (and corresponding WANTLIB for a given SUBPACKAGE).
+@@ -3569,6 +3570,18 @@ a given build dependency (and correspond
+ See
+ .Cm print-package-args Pq Cm lib-depends-args
+ for details.
++.Pp
++Many ports are using
++.Xr dlopen 3
++to probe for a library and fall back to reduced functionality if it is
++not found.
++This makes it necessary to rebuild the port when the library is updated.
++In such a case, add it to WANTLIB and LIB_DEPENDS.
++The
++.Cm lib-depends-check
++will warn about it, but it is the only way to ensure that the port is
++rebuild when the library is updated.
++A comment in the Makefile about this expected warning should be added.
+ .It "Warning: FULLPKGNAME-sub defined but not FULLPKGPATH-sub"
+ .Ev FULLPKGNAME-sub
+ has been explicitly defined by the port, instead of relying on the default,